BREAKING: U.S. weighs a Danish-style childhood vaccine schedule. Here is what that really means for your family
I can confirm federal health leaders are actively reviewing a pivot toward Denmark’s childhood vaccine timetable. The goal under discussion is fewer or differently timed early shots, closer to the Danish pattern. No final decision has been issued. Families should keep children on the current U.S. schedule until official guidance changes.

What is on the table
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has pushed his team to examine a Denmark-aligned approach that trims or delays some early childhood doses. The review focuses on whether the United States could safely shift the timing of key infant vaccines and reduce the number given at a single visit.
Any move of this size will require a formal process. Regulators must vet safety and effectiveness. Pediatricians will need clear instructions for children mid series. States will need time to update school requirements and forms. That work is only beginning.
Nothing changes for families today. Children should stay on the current U.S. schedule unless your clinician advises otherwise.
How Denmark’s schedule differs from the U.S.
Denmark starts most infant vaccines later, and it gives fewer shots in the first year. It also leaves out some vaccines that are routine in the United States.
- Denmark begins core infant doses at 3 and 5 months, then again at 12 months. The U.S. begins at birth, then 2, 4, and 6 months.
- Denmark gives MMR at 15 months, with a second dose at 4 years. The U.S. gives MMR at 12 to 15 months, then 4 to 6 years.
- Denmark does not routinely vaccinate for varicella, also called chickenpox. The U.S. gives varicella at 12 to 15 months and 4 to 6 years.
- Denmark does not routinely give a birth dose of hepatitis B. The U.S. gives hepatitis B at birth, then during infancy.
- Both countries use pneumococcal and rotavirus vaccines in infancy, but the exact timing and brands differ.
These differences reflect local disease patterns and health systems. Denmark has a smaller, more uniform population, near universal primary care access, and high vaccine uptake at scheduled ages. The United States is larger and more diverse, with wide gaps in access and coverage.
Health tradeoffs, explained
Starting later means fewer needles early on. That can reduce appointment stress and injection site reactions. It may also improve visit experience for some families. But later dosing creates a longer window when infants are not protected. In the United States, that window matters.
Measles brings the sharpest risk. The U.S. schedules the first MMR dose at 12 to 15 months to close a known vulnerability. Moving that dose to 15 months for all children would leave more toddlers unprotected during travel or outbreaks. We are also more exposed to imported measles through global travel.
Hepatitis B is another pressure point. The U.S. gives a birth dose to block mother to child spread and to protect infants whose household risks are unknown. Skipping that early shot could miss babies who need it most, especially in areas with limited prenatal care or unstable housing.
Varicella and hepatitis A are also key differences. The U.S. uses both to prevent hospitalizations and severe liver disease. Denmark does not use them routinely, because its historical burden and strategy differ. That tradeoff would need careful modeling in any U.S. shift.
Delaying or skipping vaccines outside of official guidance raises the risk of severe illness for infants and toddlers. Do not change your child’s schedule on your own.

Can a Danish model fit the United States
Pieces could fit. All of them, likely not. The U.S. has larger birth cohorts, uneven clinic access, and big differences in disease exposure. Our school entry rules and insurance systems are also complex. A safe transition would demand strong planning.
Expect heavy lifts in at least four areas. Regulators would need to update labels and recommendations. Supply teams would need new packaging plans and clinic stock. States would need to rewrite school forms and train staff. Clinicians would need clear catch up rules for millions of children already in progress.
Equity is central. A change that works in well resourced clinics might fail in communities with fewer pediatric appointments. If visits are lost or delayed, children could miss doses, which raises outbreak risk.
What parents should do now
Your job is simple, and it is important. Keep your child on the current U.S. schedule. Make your next well visit. Bring your vaccine card. Ask your pediatrician about any changes when they are official.
Action steps for families today
– Keep all vaccine appointments on the current schedule.
– Save your child’s vaccine record and bring it to every visit.
– If you have questions, ask your pediatrician or local health department.
– Watch for official guidance from your clinic and state health agency.
The road ahead
This review is a big moment for child health policy. A smarter schedule is one that protects children early, keeps visits doable for families, and sustains trust. If federal leaders propose a shift toward the Danish timetable, they must show clear evidence, strong modeling, and detailed transition plans. That includes protections for babies at highest risk, robust communication in many languages, and support for clinics that carry the heaviest load.
I will continue to report each step. For now, the safest path is steady. Keep vaccinating on time. Keep asking good questions. Clarity and calm will carry us through the change that comes next.
